There is much debate about the cause of CFS. There is also debate about what it is called. People with this condition cite many different causes, including: a virus, infection, surgery, vaccination or emotional trauma.
An incident in Bergen, Norway offers an interesting perspective for understanding health and disease. In 2004 in Bergen, there was a high incidence of people who was diagnosed with Post viral fatigue or subsequent CFS, which was linked to an outbreak of waterborne giardiasis. VI through 40 customers in Bergen, who made the lightning process. Many asked the same question: "both my partner/wife/husband etc and I drank the water of the same, which ended with fatigue, that do not." ¿?"
This is an interesting question. It is useful to consider the work of Louis Pasteur, and how has given way to the way we think in health. Work of Pasteur contributed to the theory of the germ of the disease. The germ theory proposes that microorganisms are the cause of many diseases. There is now ample evidence to support this theory. However, it is not the history.
One of his contemporaries of Pasteur, Claude Bernard, argued that the State of the ground (soil in which the disease develops) is more important in the development of the disease than the germ. Claude Bernard got the theory of field of Antoine Bechamp, who called the cell theory. There is much disagreement between Bernard and Pasteur on this issue, but on his deathbed, Pasteur retracted the germ theory, saying, "Bernard was correct." I was wrong. Microbe (germ) is nothing. "The terrain (middle) is everything."
Susan Dorey, who has written on withdrawal of Pasteur, explains "the germ theory asserts that the body is sterile and the disease is caused by external germs (microbes)." To Bechamp microbes exist naturally in the body and it is the disease that allows the organism to express themselves. "The ground, the internal environment in response to various forces, promotes the development of germs from the inside".
The point that Bernard is that we are exposed to germs all the time, but the State of the recipient is the important factor. For example, doctors treat patients day after day and are exposed to germs. However, do not get sick all the time. What is the explanation for this?
So the question made by customers: "both my partner/wife/husband etc and I drank the water of the same, which ended with the fatigue that not." ¿?" Deepak Chopra illustrates the debate follows. Asked us imagine riding two people having a roller coaster. One of them loves to roller coaster rides: what your body produces chemical substances such as endorphins, which increases the immune system. The other person hates roller coaster rides: for what its body activates the fight or flight or the physical response of emergency (PER) as it is called in the process of lightning. This change in the sympathetic nervous system and produces hormones powerful, including adrenaline, noradrenaline, dopamine, cortisol and DHEA (dehydroepiandrosterone). The result is a suppression of the immune system. If you then both these people some contaminated water of Bergen, which is the most likely outcome? Is it reasonable to expect that the person who has endorphins boosting your immune system are more likely to fight giardiasis, while the other person is more likely to become ill as a result?
A client that raises this question realized that was more prone to emotional stress, while her boyfriend was much more relaxed, and believed that this explains why became ill, while it did not.
However, before someone starts to think that this provides an explanation for the whole world, this is not the case. Not be suggested that throughout the world with this status has because they are more prone to emotional stress. Another client believes she is probably more likely to get sick after drinking contaminated water, because she had broken her leg, and was not in a normal way. When was she bad, she rarely got sick in the past, but her immune system would not have been so strong during this period. Other customers recognize that stress at work, an operation, an inoculation or other factors can have meaning of were more susceptible to the resulting organism in giardiasis. The link between stress and immune function is well established.
It is not always clear immediately what factors may have contributed to some people sick after drinking contaminated water. However, more important than the question ' what is the cause,' is "What can I do to recover my health?"? The Phil Parker Lightning process proposes that there is a way to influence our health and our lives.
How can you help the process of Lightning?
The Lightning process examines a number of factors that have influence on our health. A key element of the approach of the lightning process is the answer physical emergency (PER), also known as a mechanism of fight or flight.
When the body detects a threat, for example have a fall, getting food poisoning, getting emotional upset, the body produces to find a way to retrieve and maintain security. To this end, the change in the sympathetic nervous system and producing chemical products as described above.
This is a useful response that helps us to deal with the threat, and that affects our muscles and nervous system. This becomes problematic if we we change this system, because it affects our system immune to (which is the healing system for the body) and affects the functioning of our nerve cells.
The process of Lightning three-day workshop takes approximately 12 hours to offer and is designed to teach you:
1 About the PER and what happens if you change constantly.?
2 As ground when the PER is taking place.
3. How calm the PER with a set of steps incorporates movement, posture, and training.
4. How to make this change to its nature Physiology automatic/second, by the practice of these measures. The principle is that this allows the immune system function properly, to the health and well-being.
What evidence supports this approach?
Dr. Bruun Wyler, who is considered one of the leading experts in me, Norway has posted some interesting research, which according to the clinical outcomes of the Phil Parker Lightning process. The findings of Dr. Bruun Wyler indicate a State of permanent anguish response, or sustained excitement in patients of CFS, and he believes that these findings support the approach of the lightning process.